↓ Skip to main content

Intracranial arachnoid cysts – do they impair mental functions?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Intracranial arachnoid cysts – do they impair mental functions?
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00415-008-0011-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Wester

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 44%
Psychology 8 15%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,575,658
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,824
of 4,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,091
of 82,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.