↓ Skip to main content

Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: pumas as a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: pumas as a case study
Published in
Landscape Ecology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0301-6
Authors

Katherine A. Zeller, Kevin McGarigal, Samuel A. Cushman, Paul Beier, T. Winston Vickers, Walter M. Boyce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 351 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 22%
Student > Master 74 21%
Researcher 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 61 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 45%
Environmental Science 100 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 75 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,955,438
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#170
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,888
of 290,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.