↓ Skip to main content

Mucormycosis in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center in Lebanon: a case series

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Mucormycosis in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center in Lebanon: a case series
Published in
Infection, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s15010-018-1195-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saeed El Zein, Jean El-Sheikh, Aline Zakhem, Dima Ibrahim, Ali Bazarbachi, Souha S. Kanj

Abstract

Mucormycosis (MCM) is a rare fungal infection affecting people with impaired immunity. Data related to MCM from Lebanon are scarce. The aim of this study is to shed light on the epidemiology, incidence, and outcome of patients with MCM hospitalized at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We conducted a retrospective chart review between Jan 1, 2008 and Jan 10, 2018. All patients with proven or probable MCM were included. A total of 20 patients were included. Their median age was 49 years and the majority were males. Comorbidities included mainly hematologic malignancy and diabetes mellitus. Most common sites of involvement were rhino-orbital and pulmonary, respectively. The number of MCM cases/10.000 hospital admissions increased significantly between 2008 and 2017 (0.47 vs. 1.18; P < 0.05). A liposomal amphotericin B formulation alone or in combination with other antifungals was used as a first line agent in all patients. All-cause mortality was 60%; however, death was attributed to MCM in 20% of cases. The incidence of MCM has significantly increased over the past 10 years at our institution, most likely due to the increasing patient population at risk. Understanding the epidemiology of MCM in our setting would help guide antifungal therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,394,751
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#1,186
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,103
of 337,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.