↓ Skip to main content

Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
614 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1142 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny
Published in
Science, November 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aab2116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faiyaz Notta, Sasan Zandi, Naoya Takayama, Stephanie Dobson, Olga I Gan, Gavin Wilson, Kerstin B Kaufmann, Jessica McLeod, Elisa Laurenti, Cyrille F Dunant, John D McPherson, Lincoln D Stein, Yigal Dror, John E Dick

Abstract

In a classical view of hematopoiesis, the various blood cell lineages arise via a hierarchical scheme starting with multipotent stem cells that become increasingly restricted in their differentiation potential through oligopotent and then unipotent progenitors. We developed a cell-sorting scheme to resolve myeloid (My), erythroid (Er), and megakaryocytic (Mk) fates from single CD34+ cells and then mapped the progenitor hierarchy across human development. Fetal liver contained large numbers of distinct oligopotent progenitors with intermingled My, Er, and Mk fates. However, few oligopotent progenitor intermediates were present in the adult bone marrow. Instead only two progenitor classes predominate, multipotent and unipotent, with Er-Mk lineages emerging from multipotent cells. The developmental shift to an adult "two-tier" hierarchy challenges current dogma and provides a revised framework to understand normal and disease states of human hematopoiesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 288 25%
Researcher 213 19%
Student > Master 129 11%
Student > Bachelor 97 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 6%
Other 165 14%
Unknown 179 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 375 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 249 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 139 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 97 8%
Engineering 13 1%
Other 67 6%
Unknown 202 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#329,847
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,737
of 83,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,626
of 297,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#184
of 1,404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.