↓ Skip to main content

Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees,Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo andL. (D.) aeneiventre (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, March 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees,Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo andL. (D.) aeneiventre (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, March 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01338830
Authors

William T. Wcislo, Alvaro Wille, Enrique Orozco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 52%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#324
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,833
of 20,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.