↓ Skip to main content

Nanoporous Graphitic-C3N4@Carbon Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
968 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoporous Graphitic-C3N4@Carbon Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2011
DOI 10.1021/ja209206c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yao Zheng, Yan Jiao, Jun Chen, Jian Liu, Ji Liang, Aijun Du, Weimin Zhang, Zhonghua Zhu, Sean C. Smith, Mietek Jaroniec, Gao Qing Lu, Shi Zhang Qiao

Abstract

Based on theoretical prediction, a g-C(3)N(4)@carbon metal-free oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalyst was designed and synthesized by uniform incorporation of g-C(3)N(4) into a mesoporous carbon to enhance the electron transfer efficiency of g-C(3)N(4). The resulting g-C(3)N(4)@carbon composite exhibited competitive catalytic activity (11.3 mA cm(-2) kinetic-limiting current density at -0.6 V) and superior methanol tolerance compared to a commercial Pt/C catalyst. Furthermore, it demonstrated significantly higher catalytic efficiency (nearly 100% of four-electron ORR process selectivity) than a Pt/C catalyst. The proposed synthesis route is facile and low-cost, providing a feasible method for the development of highly efficient electrocatalysts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 287 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 29%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Master 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Professor 12 4%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 67 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 110 38%
Materials Science 32 11%
Chemical Engineering 21 7%
Engineering 16 5%
Physics and Astronomy 9 3%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 83 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,398,961
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#25,971
of 62,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,392
of 242,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#239
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.