↓ Skip to main content

Not null enough: pseudo-null hypotheses in community ecology and comparative psychology

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Not null enough: pseudo-null hypotheses in community ecology and comparative psychology
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10539-018-9640-4
Authors

William Bausman, Marta Halina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Philosophy 4 20%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,351,802
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#186
of 684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,197
of 335,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.