↓ Skip to main content

A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Primary Care Informatics-Based System for Breast Cancer Screening

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Primary Care Informatics-Based System for Breast Cancer Screening
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1500-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Atlas, Richard W. Grant, William T. Lester, Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Yuchiao Chang, Michael J. Barry, Henry C. Chueh

Abstract

Information technology offers the promise, as yet unfulfilled, of delivering efficient, evidence-based health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 7 8%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,839,484
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,786
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,456
of 98,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.