↓ Skip to main content

Foods and feeding behavior of wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus apella)

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, January 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Foods and feeding behavior of wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus apella)
Published in
Primates, January 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf02373828
Authors

Kosei Izawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 9%
Unknown 77 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 54%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Psychology 7 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,737,238
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#477
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,187
of 26,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them