↓ Skip to main content

To feel strong in an unfamiliar situation; Patients’ lived experiences of neurosurgical intensive care. A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To feel strong in an unfamiliar situation; Patients’ lived experiences of neurosurgical intensive care. A qualitative study
Published in
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Mylén, Maria Nilsson, Carina Berterö

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of conscious patients in neurosurgical intensive care. Data collection was performed by qualitative interviews using an interview guide. Eleven former patients, seven women and four men, were interviewed two to 14 months after discharge. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed using an interpretive phenomenological approach. The analysis revealed three themes: To feel safe in an unfamiliar situation, to experience strains and limitations, and to be confirmed as a human being. These three themes culminated in the essence: To feel strong in an unfamiliar situation. Patients experienced a soothing environment where, despite strains, they felt safe being cared for in a ward with specialised medical treatment. When mental and physical strains decreased during the period of care, they experienced the ability to cope with the simplest tasks as a sign of regained identity. Patients' main experience during intensive care was security. Security along with human contact and interaction with staff and next of kin made the patients feel strengthened as human beings in an unfamiliar situation. The fact that the patients were conscious enabled them to understand their situation and to experience security.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#739
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,589
of 297,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.