| Title |
Extending Persistence Using Poincaré and Lefschetz Duality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Foundations of Computational Mathematics, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10208-008-9027-z |
| Authors |
David Cohen-Steiner, Herbert Edelsbrunner, John Harer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 28 | 55% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#35
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,518
of 81,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them