↓ Skip to main content

Folic acid supplementation at lower doses increases oxidative stress resistance and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Folic acid supplementation at lower doses increases oxidative stress resistance and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
GeroScience, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11357-015-9850-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laxmi Rathor, Bashir Akhlaq Akhoon, Swapnil Pandey, Swati Srivastava, Rakesh Pandey

Abstract

Folic acid (FA) is an essential nutrient that the human body needs but cannot be synthesized on its own. Fortified foods and plant food sources such as green leafy vegetables, beans, fruits, and juices are good sources of FA to meet the daily requirements of the body. The aim was to evaluate the effect of dietary FA levels on the longevity of well-known experimental aging model Caenorhabditis elegans. Here, we show for first time that FA extends organism life span and causes a delay in aging. We observed that FA inhibits mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and insulin/insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling pathways to control both oxidative stress levels and life span. The expression levels of stress- and life span-relevant gerontogenes, viz. daf-16, skn-1, and sir. 2.1, and oxidative enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferase 4 (GST-4) and superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD-3), were also found to be highly enhanced to attenuate the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage and to delay the aging process. Our study promotes the use of FA to mitigate abiotic stresses and other aging-related ailments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#728
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,389
of 297,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.