↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of hemodynamic reactivity using dynamic variations of Analgesia/Nociception Index (∆ANI)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Prediction of hemodynamic reactivity using dynamic variations of Analgesia/Nociception Index (∆ANI)
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10877-015-9802-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Boselli, R. Logier, L. Bouvet, B. Allaouchiche

Abstract

The Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI), a 0-100 non-invasive index calculated from heart rate variability, reflects the analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia. We hypothesized that dynamic variations of ANI (∆ANI) would provide better performance than static values to predict hemodynamic reactivity during desflurane/remifentanil general anesthesia. One hundred and twenty-eight patients undergoing ear-nose-throat or lower limb orthopedic surgery were analyzed in this prospective observational study. The ANI, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded before induction, at skin incision, during procedure and at emergence from general anesthesia. Changes in these variables were recorded after 1 min for ANI (ANI1min) and 5 min for heart rate and systolic blood pressure. The dynamic variation of ANI at the different time points was defined as: ∆ANI = (ANI1min - ANI)/([ANI + ANI1min]/2). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to evaluate the performance of ANI, ANI1 min and ∆ANI to predict hemodynamic reactivity (increase by more than 20 % in heart rate and/or systolic blood pressure within 5 min). For the prediction of hemodynamic reactivity, better performance was observed with ∆ANI (area under ROC curve (AUC ROC) = 0.90) in comparison to ANI (ROC AUC = 0.50) and ANI1min (ROC AUC = 0.77). A ∆ANI threshold of -19 % predicts hemodynamic reactivity with 85 % [95 % CI 77-91] sensitivity and 85 % [95 % CI 81-89] specificity. Dynamic variations of ANI provide better performance than static values to predict hemodynamic reactivity during desflurane/remifentanil general anesthesia. These findings may be of interest for the individual adaptation of remifentanil doses guided by ∆ANI during general anesthesia, although this remains to be demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#501
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,518
of 285,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.