Title |
Luteovirus: insights into pathogenicity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Virology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00705-014-2172-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Muhammad Ali, Shahid Hameed, Muhammad Tahir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#918
of 4,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,816
of 230,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.