↓ Skip to main content

Algorithmic Complexity of EEG for Prognosis of Neurodegeneration in Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder (RBD)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Algorithmic Complexity of EEG for Prognosis of Neurodegeneration in Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder (RBD)
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10439-018-02112-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulio Ruffini, David Ibañez, Eleni Kroupi, Jean-François Gagnon, Jacques Montplaisir, Ronald B. Postuma, Marta Castellano, Aureli Soria-Frisch

Abstract

Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a serious risk factor for neurodegenerative processes such as Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigate the use of EEG algorithmic complexity derived metrics for its prognosis. We analyzed resting state EEG data collected from 114 idiopathic RBD patients and 83 healthy controls in a longitudinal study forming a cohort in which several RBD patients developed PD or dementia with Lewy bodies. Multichannel data from ~ 3 min recordings was converted to spectrograms and their algorithmic complexity estimated using Lempel-Ziv-Welch compression. Complexity measures and entropy rate displayed statistically significant differences between groups. Results are compared to those using the ratio of slow to fast frequency power, which they are seen to complement by displaying increased sensitivity even when using a few EEG channels. Poor prognosis in RBD appears to be associated with decreased complexity of EEG spectrograms stemming in part from frequency power imbalances and cross-frequency amplitude algorithmic coupling. Algorithmic complexity metrics provide a robust, powerful and complementary way to quantify the dynamics of EEG signals in RBD with links to emerging theories of brain function stemming from algorithmic information theory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 16%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Psychology 6 9%
Computer Science 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 34%