| Title |
Why are physicians not persuaded by scientific evidence? A grounded theory interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-6-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miho Sekimoto, Yuichi Imanaka, Nobuko Kitano, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Osamu Takahashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 81 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 27% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,790,805
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#613
of 8,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,056
of 168,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.