↓ Skip to main content

The Human Epigenome Browser at Washington University

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Human Epigenome Browser at Washington University
Published in
Nature Methods, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.1772
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Zhou, Brett Maricque, Mingchao Xie, Daofeng Li, Vasavi Sundaram, Eric A Martin, Brian C Koebbe, Cydney Nielsen, Martin Hirst, Peggy Farnham, Robert M Kuhn, Jingchun Zhu, Ivan Smirnov, W James Kent, David Haussler, Pamela A F Madden, Joseph F Costello, Ting Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 187 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 26%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 11 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 22%
Computer Science 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 22 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,189,751
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,341
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,915
of 250,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.