You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Human Epigenome Browser at Washington University
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.1772 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xin Zhou, Brett Maricque, Mingchao Xie, Daofeng Li, Vasavi Sundaram, Eric A Martin, Brian C Koebbe, Cydney Nielsen, Martin Hirst, Peggy Farnham, Robert M Kuhn, Jingchun Zhu, Ivan Smirnov, W James Kent, David Haussler, Pamela A F Madden, Joseph F Costello, Ting Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 187 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 64 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 26% |
Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
Other | 35 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 22% |
Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 6% |
Unknown | 22 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,189,751
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,341
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,915
of 250,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.