↓ Skip to main content

Concomitant corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) for the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Concomitant corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) for the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00405-015-3832-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaoyan Feng, Yunping Fan, Zibin Liang, Renqiang Ma, Wanwei Cao

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the symptomatic management of corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) with that of either therapy given alone, or placebo in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). The PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis reporting were followed. Total nasal symptom scores and individual nasal symptom scores were pooled after assessing heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) between treatments. A total of ten studies fulfilled eligibility. Three trials studied the combination therapy of corticosteroid nasal spray and oral antihistamine. Pooled results of two trials failed to show significant difference on total nasal symptoms between combination therapy and intranasal corticosteroid alone (WMD = -0.20, 95 % CI -0.38 to -0.01, P = 0.04). The qualitative analysis showed that combination therapy has greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in improving symptoms. Seven trials investigated corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine nasal spray. The cumulative meta-analysis of six RCTs revealed that combination therapy was superior to solo intranasal corticosteroid (WMD = -1.16, 95 % CI -1.49 to -0.83, P < 0.00001), solo intranasal antihistamine (WMD = -1.73, 95 % CI -2.08 to -1.38, P < 0.00001), and placebo (WMD = -2.81, 95 % CI -3.16 to -2.47, P < 0.00001) in improving total nasal symptom scores. Intranasal corticosteroid plus oral antihistamine have similar efficacy to intranasal corticosteroid alone, greater efficacy than oral antihistamines alone or placebo in reducing nasal symptoms for AR patients. Intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine are significantly superior to either therapy given alone, or placebo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#12,645,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#777
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,772
of 285,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.