↓ Skip to main content

Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives
Published in
Synthese, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0062-6
Authors

Hélène Landemore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 33%
Philosophy 14 14%
Psychology 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,295,985
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#83
of 2,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,115
of 163,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.