↓ Skip to main content

Cruciferous vegetables: prototypic anti-inflammatory food components

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Cruciferous vegetables: prototypic anti-inflammatory food components
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40816-015-0011-2
Authors

Herbert Tilg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,224,760
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,886
of 289,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them