↓ Skip to main content

Socio-demographic patterns of disability among older adult populations of low-income and middle-income countries: results from World Health Survey

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Socio-demographic patterns of disability among older adult populations of low-income and middle-income countries: results from World Health Survey
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00038-015-0742-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor, Nicole Bergen, Nenad Kostanjsek, Paul Kowal, Alana Officer, Somnath Chatterji

Abstract

Our objective was to quantify disability prevalence among older adults of low- and middle-income countries, and measure socio-demographic distribution of disability. World Health Survey data included 53,447 adults aged 50 or older from 43 low- and middle-income countries. Disability was a binary classification, based on a composite score derived from self-reported functional difficulties. Socio-demographic variables included sex, age, marital status, area of residence, education level, and household economic status. A multivariate Poisson regression model with robust variance was used to assess associations between disability and socio-demographic variables. Overall, 33.3 % (95 % CI 32.2-34.4 %) of older adults reported disability. Disability was 1.5 times more common in females, and was positively associated with increasing age. Divorced/separated/widowed respondents reported higher disability rates in all but one study country, and education and wealth levels were inversely associated with disability rates. Urban residence tended to be advantageous over rural. Country-level datasets showed disparate patterns. Effective approaches aimed at disability prevention and improved disability management are warranted, including the inclusion of equity considerations in monitoring and evaluation activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 25 17%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 43 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Social Sciences 22 15%
Psychology 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 51 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,570,939
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#676
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,804
of 296,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.