↓ Skip to main content

Weight Management for Athletes and Active Individuals: A Brief Review

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
Title
Weight Management for Athletes and Active Individuals: A Brief Review
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0401-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda M. Manore

Abstract

Weight management for athletes and active individuals is unique because of their high daily energy expenditure; thus, the emphasis is usually placed on changing the diet side of the energy balance equation. When dieting for weight loss, active individuals also want to preserve lean tissue, which means that energy restriction cannot be too severe or lean tissue is lost. First, this brief review addresses the issues of weight management in athletes and active individuals and factors to consider when determining a weight-loss goal. Second, the concept of dynamic energy balance is reviewed, including two mathematical models developed to improve weight-loss predictions based on changes in diet and exercise. These models are now available on the Internet. Finally, dietary strategies for weight loss/maintenance that can be successfully used with active individuals are given. Emphasis is placed on teaching the benefits of consuming a low-ED diet (e.g., high-fiber, high-water, low-fat foods), which allows for the consumption of a greater volume of food to increase satiety while reducing energy intake. Health professionals and sport dietitians need to understand dynamic energy balance and be prepared with effective and evidence-based dietary approaches to help athletes and active individuals achieve their body-weight goals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 376 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 92 24%
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 20 5%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 84 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 102 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 102 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,062,646
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,671
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,035
of 298,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#41
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.