You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0142723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Hoare, Zoë Slote Morris, Michael P Kelly, Isla Kuhn, Stephen Barclay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 222 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 98 | 44% |
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 23% |
| Scientists | 44 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 21% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#215,344
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,163
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,839
of 298,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#67
of 5,178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.