↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Patients and the Internet: a Survey Among German Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Cancer Patients and the Internet: a Survey Among German Cancer Patients
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13187-015-0945-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Desiree Ebel, Jan Stellamanns, Christian Keinki, Ivonne Rudolph, Jutta Huebner

Abstract

An increasing number of patients and relatives use the Internet to get additional or initial information about their disease. The aim of the study was to reevaluate the Internet usage among German cancer patients. Using a standardized questionnaire, we did an anonymous survey on patients attending a series of lectures on complementary medicine in 2014. We received 255 questionnaires. Nearly 80 % of the participants stated that they used the Internet to read up information about health or medicine issues. There was no significant difference regarding gender, age, or status (patient, current treatment/former treatment; relatives). Most users use the Internet in order to get additional information after a consultation with a physician (82.2 %). Important qualities from the view of the patient are a trustable source (65.3 %), information from experts (59.6 %), and actual information (52.8 %). There is an increasing number of patients in Germany looking for information in the Internet mostly in the intention of getting additional information. Yet, as the quality of information is heterogeneous, false information may lead to distrust in the doctor or wrong decision-making. Accordingly, organizations working on improving quality of cancer care should engage in conveying comprehensive and actual information adapted to the needs of patients. Physicians should know trustful websites for referral of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Psychology 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,533,291
of 23,901,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#287
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,090
of 288,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,901,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.