↓ Skip to main content

The non-immunosuppressive management of childhood nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The non-immunosuppressive management of childhood nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00467-015-3241-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

James McCaffrey, Rachel Lennon, Nicholas J. A. Webb

Abstract

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is one of the most common renal diseases found in the paediatric population and is associated with significant complications, including infection and thrombosis. A high proportion of children enter sustained remission before adulthood, and therapy must therefore mitigate the childhood complications, while minimising the long-term risk to health. Here we address the main complications of INS and summarise the available evidence and guidance to aid the clinician in determining the appropriate treatment for children with INS under their care. Additionally, we highlight areas where no consensus regarding appropriate management has been reached. In this review, we detail the reasons why routine prophylactic antimicrobial and antithrombotic therapy are not warranted in INS and emphasise the conservative management of oedema. When pharmacological intervention is required for the treatment of oedema, we provide guidance to aid the clinician in determining the appropriate therapy. Additionally, we discuss obesity and growth, fracture risk, dyslipidaemia and thyroid dysfunction associated with INS. Where appropriate, we describe how recent developments in research have identified potential novel therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,551,998
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#278
of 3,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,632
of 282,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.