↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Obesity in Adults: Latest Trends

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology of Obesity in Adults: Latest Trends
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13679-018-0317-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yosuke Inoue, Bo Qin, Jennifer Poti, Rebeccah Sokol, Penny Gordon-Larsen

Abstract

An increasing trend in obesity prevalence since the early 1980s has posed a significant population health burden across the globe. We conducted a systematic review for studies using measured anthropometry to examine trends in obesity in the USA published from 2012 to 2018 and for systematic reviews to document trends in obesity across the globe published from 2014 to 2018. For the USA, the only nationally representative data source capturing trends in obesity in this period was the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which uses repeated cross-sectional data to document national trends in obesity in the USA. For global trends, the only systematic reviews of obesity across the globe were the Global Burden of Disease Obesity study and the Non-communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration study. In general, the population distribution of body mass index (BMI) in the USA has shifted towards the upper end of its distribution over the past three decades. The global distribution has similarly increased, albeit with large regional differences. US and global studies suggest an increasing trend in obesity since the 1980s, and there is a dearth of nationally representative longitudinal studies using measured anthropometry to capture trends in adult obesity in the USA for the same individuals over time. Greater efforts are needed to identify factors contributing to the continued increases in obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 14 4%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 137 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 143 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,648,325
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#333
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,223
of 334,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.