↓ Skip to main content

Teledermatology service audit

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Journal of Dermatology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teledermatology service audit
Published in
Australasian Journal of Dermatology, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/ajd.12411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Finnane, Gregory Siller, Redzo Mujcic, H Peter Soyer

Abstract

To conduct an audit of the Skin Emergency Telemedicine Service at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane from January to December 2014, and determine whether there has been any change in the number, type and location of referrals. Retrospective analyses of referrals to the teledermatology service were conducted and compared with the 2012 audit. Main outcomes assessed included the number of referrals, referral site location, telediagnosis categories, image characteristics and response times. In 2014, 318 cases were referred to the teledermatology service. The highest number of cases (n = 140) were referred from Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital emergency departments. However, referrals to the teledermatology service came from as far as 1600 km distant from Brisbane. The most common provisional telediagnoses were dermatitis or eczema, skin infection or drug eruption. Over half of all referrals (62%) received a response within 3 h and a further 20% were responded to within 3-6 h. Almost half all referring doctors (48%) attached very large image files (> 500 kb) to their referral. The Skin Emergency Telemedicine Service has proved to be a successful, sustainable and valuable addition to the specialist dermatology services provided across Queensland. With adequate funding and resources and appropriate attention to ethical and legal considerations, our service could significantly change the management of Queenslanders with acute skin conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,080,409
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Journal of Dermatology
#266
of 937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,815
of 287,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Journal of Dermatology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.