↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of an expanded use of plasma exchange for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis within a dedicated clinical service

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Benefits of an expanded use of plasma exchange for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis within a dedicated clinical service
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12891-015-0796-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neeraj Dhaun, Andrew Saunders, Christopher O. Bellamy, Rocío Martinez Gallardo, Lynn Manson, David C. Kluth

Abstract

Current recommendations for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) support its management within a dedicated clinical service. Therapies for AAV are imperfect with many patients failing to achieve disease control and others experiencing disease relapse. Plasma exchange (PEX) may be beneficial especially when the kidney is involved. Within a new, dedicated service we retrospectively assessed, over a 6-year period, the benefits of PEX in two patient cohorts, discriminated by PEX treatment alone. Patients received PEX alongside standard of care if they fulfilled any of the following criteria: 1. serum creatinine >500 μmol/l or dialysis-requiring renal failure, 2. alveolar haemorrhage, 3. renal biopsy showing ≥30 % focal and necrotising lesions ± cellular crescents. Outcome measures included disease remission and relapse, cumulative immunosuppression, and morbidity and mortality. Of 104 new patients, 58 patients received PEX at presentation, 46 did not. Cyclophosphamide and/or rituximab dosing was similar for both groups. Although patients receiving PEX had poorer renal function, a higher C-reactive protein and disease activity score at presentation disease remission rate was similar in both groups (no PEX vs. PEX: 96 % vs. 98 %). The PEX group entered remission quicker (no PEX vs. PEX: 3.9 ± 4.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3 months, p < 0.05), with a lower 3-month cumulative glucocorticoid dose (no PEX vs. PEX: 2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.2 g, p < 0.001). Relapse was similar between groups but adverse events lower in the PEX group. PEX may be of benefit in AAV. Larger, longer randomised controlled trials are now needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 63%
Unspecified 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 20%