| Title |
Brief Report: Do You See What I See? The Perception of Bullying in Male Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-018-3739-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoe Hodgins, Elizabeth Kelley, Patricia Kloosterman, Layla Hall, Chloe C. Hudson, Rosaria Furlano, Wendy Craig |
| Abstract |
Although there is evidence to suggest that adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulty interpreting complex social situations, little is known about their understanding of bullying. Given the high rates of victimization in this population, it is important to investigate how adolescents with ASD comprehend bullying. Male adolescents with ASD and IQ-matched typically-developing (TD) controls (Mage = 14.62, SD = 1.91) watched six videos portraying bullying scenarios and were interviewed after each video. The interviews were coded for the participants' understanding of the bullying scenarios. Results indicated that adolescents with ASD had significantly lower bullying understanding scores than TD adolescents. These novel findings suggest that male adolescents with ASD understand bullying differently than their TD peers. Implications for experiences with victimization are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,045,976
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,270
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,338
of 346,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#31
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.