↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in the neural correlates of aggression

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Sex differences in the neural correlates of aggression
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00429-018-1739-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Repple, Ute Habel, Lisa Wagels, Christina M. Pawliczek, Frank Schneider, Nils Kohn

Abstract

Although sex differences in aggression have been investigated for decades, little is known about the underlying neurobiology of this phenomenon. To address this gap, the present study implemented a social reactive aggression paradigm in 20 women and 22 men, employing a modified Taylor Aggression Task (mTAT) to provoke aggressive behavior in an fMRI setting. Subjects were provoked by money subtraction from a fake opponent and given the opportunity to retaliate likewise. In the absence of behavioral differences, male and female subjects showed differential brain activation patterns in response to provocation. Men had higher left amygdala activation during high provocation. This amygdala activation correlated with trait anger scores in men, but not in women. Also, men showed a positive association between orbitofrontal cortex, rectal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activity in the provocation contrast and their tendency to respond aggressively, whereas women displayed a negative association. As the rectal gyrus and OFC have been attributed a crucial role in automatic emotion regulation, this finding points toward the assumption that highly aggressive men use automatic emotion regulation to a greater extent in response to provocation compared to highly aggressive women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 16%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 42 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,475,396
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#569
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,515
of 343,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.