↓ Skip to main content

A smart pipe energy harvester excited by fluid flow and base excitation

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mechanica, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A smart pipe energy harvester excited by fluid flow and base excitation
Published in
Acta Mechanica, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00707-018-2235-y
Authors

M. F. Lumentut, M. I. Friswell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 72%
Mathematics 2 11%
Materials Science 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mechanica
#71
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,546
of 334,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mechanica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.