| Title |
Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Netherlands Heart Journal, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12471-017-1063-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. J. R. Snijder, M. J. Suttorp, J. M. ten Berg, M. C. Post |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
| Librarian | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,575,658
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#158
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,269
of 439,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.