↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Construction Contract Prices for Traditionally Procured Roads and Public–Private Partnerships

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Industrial Organization, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Comparison of Construction Contract Prices for Traditionally Procured Roads and Public–Private Partnerships
Published in
Review of Industrial Organization, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11151-009-9224-1
Authors

Frédéric Blanc-Brude, Hugh Goldsmith, Timo Välilä

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 27 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 18%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Design 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,575,658
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Review of Industrial Organization
#124
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,597
of 93,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Industrial Organization
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them