You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cancer Risks for PMS2-Associated Lynch Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2018.78.4777 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanne W. ten Broeke, Heleen M. van der Klift, Carli M.J. Tops, Stefan Aretz, Inge Bernstein, Daniel D. Buchanan, Albert de la Chapelle, Gabriel Capella, Mark Clendenning, Christoph Engel, Steven Gallinger, Encarna Gomez Garcia, Jane C. Figueiredo, Robert Haile, Heather L. Hampel, Liselotte van Hest, John L. Hopper, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Loic Le Marchand, Tom G.W. Letteboer, Mark A. Jenkins, Annika Lindblom, Noralane M. Lindor, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Pål Møller, Polly A. Newcomb, Theo A.M. van Os, Rachel Pearlman, Marta Pineda, Nils Rahner, Egbert J.W. Redeker, Maran J.W. Olderode-Berends, Christophe Rosty, Hans K. Schackert, Rodney Scott, Leigha Senter, Liesbeth Spruijt, Verena Steinke-Lange, Manon Suerink, Stephen Thibodeau, Yvonne J. Vos, Anja Wagner, Ingrid Winship, Frederik J. Hes, Hans F.A. Vasen, Juul T. Wijnen, Maartje Nielsen, Aung Ko Win |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| Brazil | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 56% |
| Scientists | 11 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 56 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#892,606
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,129
of 22,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,794
of 346,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#31
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.