↓ Skip to main content

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00467-018-4067-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathrin L Salvador, Camilla Tøndel, Alexander D Rowe, Anna Bjerre, Atle Brun, Damien Brackman, Lars Mørkrid

Abstract

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations (eGFR) is widely used in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to compare new and old eGFR equations with measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance in a cohort of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We examined 96 children (median age 9.2 years (range 0.25-17.5)) with CKD stages 1-5. A 7-point iohexol clearance (GFR7p) was defined as the reference method (median mGFR 66 mL/min/1.73 m2, range 6-153). Ten different eGFR equations, with or without body height, were evaluated: Schwartzbedside, SchwartzCKiD, SchwartzcysC, CAPA, LMREV, (LMREV + CAPA) / 2, FAScrea, FAScysC, FAScombi, FASheight. The accuracy was evaluated with percentage within 10 and 30% of GFR7p (P10 and P30). In the group with mGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the SchwartzcysC equation had the lowest median bias (interquartile range; IQR) 3.27 (4.80) mL/min/1.73 m2 and the highest accuracy with P10 of 44% and P30 of 85%. In the group with mGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the SchwartzCKiD presented with the lowest bias 3.41 (13.1) mL/min/1.73 m2 and P10 of 62% and P30 of 98%. Overall, the SchwartzcysC had the lowest bias - 1.49 (13.5) mL/min/1.73 m2 and both SchwartzcysC and SchwartzCKiD showed P30 of 90%. P10 was 44 and 48%, respectively. The SchwartzcysC and the combined SchwartzCKiD present with lower bias and higher accuracy as compared to the other equations. The SchwartzcysC equation is a good height-independent alternative to the SchwartzCKiD equation in children and can be reported directly by the laboratory information system. ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,123,516
of 25,126,845 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#624
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,018
of 341,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#16
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,126,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.