↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
528 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, May 2009
DOI 10.2196/jmir.1151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn Meyer, Thomas Berger, Franz Caspar, Christopher G Beevers, Gerhard Andersson, Mario Weiss

Abstract

Depression is associated with immense suffering and costs, and many patients receive inadequate care, often because of the limited availability of treatment. Web-based treatments may play an increasingly important role in closing this gap between demand and supply. We developed the integrative, Web-based program Deprexis, which covers therapeutic approaches such as behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, mindfulness/acceptance exercises, and social skills training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 514 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 16%
Researcher 69 13%
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 10%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 93 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 221 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 13%
Social Sciences 26 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 4%
Computer Science 14 3%
Other 64 12%
Unknown 114 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#929,987
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#670
of 7,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,186
of 106,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.