↓ Skip to main content

Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10151-015-1390-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Kneist, N. Wachter, M. Paschold, D. W. Kauff, A. D. Rink, H. Lang

Abstract

Information on functional outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is limited. This study analyzed the functional results in patients with low rectal cancer. Ten consecutive patients (nine males) undergoing electrophysiologically controlled nerve-sparing taTME were investigated prospectively and asked to complete functional questionnaires [the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function, Female Sexual Function Index, Wexner score, and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score]. Bladder function was also assessed according to residual urine volume. Preoperative function was compared to the functional outcome 3 and 6 months, and 9 months if eligible, after stoma closure or surgery in the absence of a diverting stoma. Prior to therapy, urinary and sexual function was impaired in 40 and 60 % of patients, respectively. None of the patients developed pathological residual urine volumes after at least unilateral functional pelvic nerve-sparing. Median IPSS was lower than preoperative scores (p > 0.05). Two males with incomplete nerve preservation were considered impotent during a median follow-up of 15 months (range 6-20 months). The female was judged to be sexually inactive. The median Wexner score was 1 (range 0-7) prior to any therapy and increased to 7 (range 0-15) at 6 months (p = 0.029), with 40 % of patients categorized as having no LARS and 50 % minor LARS. The median LARS score was 28 (range 9-38) at 3 months and 26 (range 9-32) at 6 months (p = 0.165). Despite a small sample size and confounding factors, data indicate that taTME has the potential to preserve continence, sufficient bowel function, and urogenital function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 28 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,744,347
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#845
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,632
of 282,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.