↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous steppe restoration on abandoned cropland in Kazakhstan: grazing affects successional pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous steppe restoration on abandoned cropland in Kazakhstan: grazing affects successional pathways
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-1020-7
Authors

Annika Brinkert, Norbert Hölzel, Tatyana V. Sidorova, Johannes Kamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Master 14 24%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 36%
Environmental Science 18 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Chemistry 1 2%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,251
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,676
of 300,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.