↓ Skip to main content

Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011
Published in
Quality of Life Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11136-015-1164-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. A. Garcia-Gordillo, J. C. Adsuar, P. R. Olivares

Abstract

To derive EQ-5D-5L Spanish population norms based on a national representative sample adjusted by age, gender and region. A representative sample of the Spanish general population (n = 21,007) was used in a cross-sectional study. The source of data was the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012. All socio-demographic factors and clinical characteristics were carried to a descriptive analysis. All variables were stratified by region, gender and age-group. The utility value 1 is the most repeated (62 %) in this representative population sample. This study showed a deterioration of health states as age increases. Overall, men reported better health status than women. In relation to ceiling effect by regions, there was little difference with the highest scores. Conversely, the lowest score corresponds to Galicia. The paper reports EQ-5D-5L normative data for Spanish general population, based on a national representative sample adjusted by region, gender and age-group. These results may serve as reference data of the population health status. A regional difference in health status could be observed, which might suggest that policies aiming to reduce regional inequalities are important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 107 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 39 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 49 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,828,324
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#676
of 3,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,429
of 289,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#14
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.