↓ Skip to main content

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade
Published in
European Radiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5698-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ceyda Turan Bektas, Burak Kocak, Aytul Hande Yardimci, Mehmet Hamza Turkcanoglu, Ugur Yucetas, Sevim Baykal Koca, Cagri Erdim, Ozgur Kilickesmez

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis using different machine learning (ML) classifiers for discriminating low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (cc-RCCs). This retrospective study included 53 patients with pathologically proven 54 cc-RCCs (31 low-grade [grade 1 or 2]; 23 high-grade [grade 3 or 4]). In one patient, two synchronous cc-RCCs were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.5 years. Thirty-four (64.1%) patients were male and 19 were female (35.9%). Mean tumour size based on the maximum diameter was 57.4 mm (range, 16-145 mm). Forty patients underwent radical nephrectomy and 13 underwent partial nephrectomy. Following pre-processing steps, two-dimensional CT texture features were extracted using portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Reproducibility of texture features was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Nested cross-validation with a wrapper-based algorithm was used in feature selection and model optimisation. The ML classifiers were support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP, a sort of neural network), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest. The performance of the classifiers was compared by certain metrics. Among 279 texture features, 241 features with an ICC equal to or higher than 0.80 (excellent reproducibility) were included in the further feature selection process. The best model was created using SVM. The selected subset of features for SVM included five co-occurrence matrix (ICC range, 0.885-0.998), three run-length matrix (ICC range, 0.889-0.992), one gradient (ICC = 0.998), and four Haar wavelet features (ICC range, 0.941-0.997). The overall accuracy, sensitivity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), specificity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), and overall area under the curve of the best model were 85.1%, 91.3%, 80.6%, and 0.860, respectively. The ML-based CT texture analysis can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for prediction of low and high Fuhrman nuclear grade cc-RCCs. • Based on the percutaneous biopsy literature, ML-based CT texture analysis has a comparable predictive performance with percutaneous biopsy. • Highest predictive performance was obtained with use of the SVM. • SVM correctly classified 85.1% of cc-RCCs in terms of nuclear grade, with an AUC of 0.860.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 45 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Computer Science 11 9%
Engineering 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 52 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,625,854
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,032
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,845
of 334,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.