↓ Skip to main content

Can apical periodontitis affect serum levels of CRP, IL-2, and IL-6 as well as induce pathological changes in remote organs?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Can apical periodontitis affect serum levels of CRP, IL-2, and IL-6 as well as induce pathological changes in remote organs?
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00784-015-1646-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinxiu Zhang, Xiaojing Huang, Bingling Lu, Chengfei Zhang, Zhiyu Cai

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether apical periodontitis (AP) could cause systemic cytokine elevation and pathological changes in remote organs in an experimental animal model. AP was induced in 36 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 2 (IL-2), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays at different time intervals (0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks) after pulp exposure. Multiple organs (the aortic arch, myocardium, liver, and spleen) were collected for histological observation. The results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Serum levels of CRP, IL-2, and IL-6 were significantly elevated at all time points assessed after 6, 24, and 96 h, respectively. The peak values of serum cytokines (CRP 6.363 ± 0.05 ng/ml, IL-2 21.997 ± 0.15 ng/L, and IL-6 2.406 ± 0.02 ng/L) were reached at 1, 4, and 2 weeks, respectively, followed by a decline. Time-dependent reversible histopathological changes were detected in the aortic arch, myocardium, and spleen, whereas irreversible changes were found in the liver. AP elevated the levels of CRP, IL-2, and IL-6 in rat blood serum, causing reversible changes in the aortic arch, myocardium, and spleen as well as irreversible changes in the liver. AP may trigger a systemic immune response, impair remote organs, and affect the general health of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#1,019
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,863
of 282,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.