You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
急性腎障害合併播種性血管内凝固症候群患者に対する遺伝子組み換えヒト可溶性トロンボモジュリン製剤の至適投与量の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11240/jsem.21.589 |
| Authors |
中村 智美, 石倉 宏恭, 中野 貴文, 仲村 佳彦, 神村 英利 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#119
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,455
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them