↓ Skip to main content

Intensive care unit acquired muscle weakness: when should we consider rehabilitation?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intensive care unit acquired muscle weakness: when should we consider rehabilitation?
Published in
Critical Care, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7937
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zudin Puthucheary, Nicholas Hart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 21 28%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,972
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,084
of 122,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.