↓ Skip to main content

Radiolabeled PLGA Nanoparticles for Effective Targeting of Bendamustine in Tumor Bearing Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Radiolabeled PLGA Nanoparticles for Effective Targeting of Bendamustine in Tumor Bearing Mice
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11095-018-2482-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iliyas Khan, Avinash Gothwal, Ankur Kaul, Rashi Mathur, Anil Kumar Mishra, Umesh Gupta

Abstract

Bendamustine is an important drug for the treatment of chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, its delivery is challenging due to its instability. Current approach reports the development and characterization of bendamustine encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles for the effective targeting to leukemic cells. The prepared, bendamustine loaded PLGA nanoparticles (BLPNP) were developed and characterized for particle size, zeta potential and polydispersity index. The formed nanoparticles were further characterized with the help of electron microscopy for surface morphology. The formed nanoparticles were evaluated for cytotoxicity, cell uptake, ROS and cell apoptosis against THP-1 leukemic cells as a part of in vitro evaluation. In vivo organ bio-distribution and tumor regression studies were performed to track in vivo behaviour of BLPNP. The average particle size was 138.52 ± 3.25 nm, with 0.192 ± 0.036 PDI and - 25.4 ± 1.38 mV zeta potential. TEM images revealed the homogeneous particle size distribution with uniform shape. In vitro release exhibited a sustained drug-release behaviour up to 24 h. Cytotoxicity against THP-1 cells through MTT assay observed IC50 value of 27.8 ± 2.1 μM for BLPNP compared to pure drug, which was 50.42 ± 3.4 μM. Moreover, in vitro studies like cell-uptake and cell apoptosis studies further confirmed the higher accumulation of BLPNP in comparison to the pure drug. Organ distribution and tumor regression studies were performed to track in vivo behaviour of bendamustine loaded nanoparticles. The overall study described a promising approach in terms of safety, least erythrocytic toxicity, better IC50 value with enhance tumor targeting and regression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 19%
Chemistry 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,792,979
of 24,071,812 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,265
of 2,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,520
of 338,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,812 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.