Title |
Hybrid Ionosilica containing aromatic groups
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1140/epjst/e2015-02489-4 |
Authors |
U.D. Thach, B. Prelot, P. Hesemann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 56% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
Materials Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#284
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,254
of 274,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.