↓ Skip to main content

Molecular signatures of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-mediated tissue repair

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Molecular signatures of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-mediated tissue repair
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0214-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Katsuda, Takahiro Ochiya

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play important roles in intercellular communications via their content molecules, and mimic, at least in part, the roles that are played by their originating cells. Consistent with this notion, an increasing number of reports have suggested that EVs derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are therapeutically beneficial to a wide range of diseases, can serve as drugs to treat multiple diseases. EVs contain a variety of molecules, including proteins, microRNAs, and mRNAs, and are associated with biological processes in a content molecule-dependent manner. In this article, we review the latest reports regarding the therapeutic potential of MSC-EVs by focusing on the underlying molecular mechanisms of their effects. Specifically, we feature the effects of MSC-EVs in terms of their content molecules and of the tissue recovery processes endowed by these molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 17%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 34 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#12,878,242
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#854
of 2,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,607
of 282,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#27
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.