↓ Skip to main content

Testicular morphology in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism after the abuse of anabolic steroids

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Testicular morphology in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism after the abuse of anabolic steroids
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-0015-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armin Alibegović

Abstract

Hypogonadism in men results from the failure of the testes to produce physiological levels of testosterone and a normal number of spermatozoa due to a disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. An example of secondary hypogonadism as a result of anabolic steroid abuse is presented with the case report of a man who committed suicide after a history of aggressive behavior and physical abuse of his wife. The autopsy revealed shrunken testicles, with more than 30% of parenchymatous sclerosis, absent spermatogenesis, and very few Leydig cells detected only by immunohistochemistry. A low-specific immunochemical analysis revealed a very high level of total testosterone (serum 109.8 nmol/L; urine 81.2 nmol/L). A more accurate analysis confirmed an overdose of synthetic anabolic steroids. Doctors in different medical areas should be alerted to chronic abusers of synthetic anabolic steroids among the growing number of recreational athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 31%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,971,225
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#294
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,809
of 339,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.