↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs, TGF-β signaling, and the inflammatory microenvironment in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
MicroRNAs, TGF-β signaling, and the inflammatory microenvironment in cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4374-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingling Guo, Yongsheng Zhang, Lifeng Zhang, Fengbo Huang, Jinfan Li, Shouli Wang

Abstract

Inflammatory cells and mediators form a major part of the tumor microenvironment and play important roles in the regulation of cancer initiation, tumor cell proliferation, and metastasis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in several physiological and pathological processes, including the regulation of the inflammatory microenvironment in cancer. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is an inflammation-related cytokine that functions in both tumor suppression and promotion; however, its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Recent evidence indicates an association between miRNAs and TGF-β signaling, providing new insight into the nature of the inflammatory microenvironment in cancer. The present review is an overview of the interaction between miRNAs and inflammatory cytokines, with emphasis on the cross talk between TGF-β signaling and miRNAs and their influence on cancer cell behavior. The emerging roles of miRNAs in cancer-related inflammation and the potential to target miRNA signaling pathways for cancer therapy are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,130,979
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,024
of 2,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,642
of 288,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#64
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.