↓ Skip to main content

Establishing a dual knock-out cell line by lentivirus based combined CRISPR/Cas9 and Loxp/Cre system

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Establishing a dual knock-out cell line by lentivirus based combined CRISPR/Cas9 and Loxp/Cre system
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10616-018-0252-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya Li, Weifeng Zhang, Junli Zhao, Sai Li, Linlin Shan, Jiuling Zhu, Yan Li, He Zhu, Qinwen Mao, Haibin Xia

Abstract

The clustered regulatory interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has been widely used for gene knock-out. Lentiviral vectors have been commonly used as a delivery method for this system, however, prolonged Cas9/sgRNA expression due to lentiviral integration can lead to accumulating off-target mutations. To solve this issue in engineering a gene knock-out cell line, this study established a novel system, which was composed of two lentiviral vectors. One lentiviral vector carried simultaneously sgRNAs and CRISPR/Cas9 expression cassettes targeting single or multiple gene(s); the other lentiviral vector carried Cre that could remove excess sgRNAs and Cas9 expression cassettes in the genome after gene targeting was achieved. To prove the principle, two candidate genes, extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) and progranulin (PGRN), both highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, were selected for testing the novel system. A dual knock-out of ECM1 and PGRN was successfully achieved in MDA-MB-231 cell line, with the sgRNAs and Cas9 expression cassettes being removed by Cre. This system should have great potential in applications for multiple genes knock-out in vitro.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#339
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,150
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.